On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:16:30 -0500, James Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Let's remember that this is a family friendly email list and watch the
>language.
>
Ya know I always thought that the F'ing was what families were all about. By
the same token I can't for the life of me understand what F'ING READ means.
What does F'ing have to do with reading? I supose Chad might be procreating
while reading mailist, but I don't think it has anything to do with what he
is typing about.
>
>
>
>Chad Smith wrote:
>> On 3/16/06, Rigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>
>> - if you are going to participate in this form of
>> communication you HAVE TO F'ING READ. If you aren't going to read - then
>> don't reply. This is the third time I've had to explain a very simple
>> concept in this same thread - and I'm just repeating myself. because people
>> refuse to read my whole email It's maddening! They just look at part of
>> the email and hit reply - or they just read one email, out of the context of
>> the thread (which, again, ended 5 damn days ago) and decide they need to
>> "inform" me of something I already said in the thread - like it's news to
>> me.
>>
>>
>> I marginallized his pet project of ODF - he wanted to piss me off - which he
>> did.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So is informing yourself to the facts before making an ass of yourself by
>> talking down to people and telling them things they already know. So is
>> reading the thread before replying to it.
>>
>>
>>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond Lloyd :Opinions and Commentary are free
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :That is what I charge and that is
:what they are worth.
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/spiritof76
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
