On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 13:05 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > However, there are many forms of "code reuse".
And all very interesting, but what is the OpenOffice.org development strategy for 2.1 and 3.0? Without knowing this in some detail all the discussions on possible courses of action become largely an inefficient waste of effort. > An awful lot of the work in OO.o was to try to use external components > unchanged, and drop the rotten internal instances OO.o 1 used (this is > why Linux and WinXP widgets look native now for example). And this work > is far from finished (unix printing...) Ok so let's have a published page in plain English giving an overview of the development strategy, the coding priorities and what is left to do before new work starts and what the priorities are for the new work. Maybe it exists so if so let's have the URL. Then if it isn't on the allocated resource planning we know if some group wants it they are going to have to get it done themselves. -- Ian Lynch www.theINGOTs.org www.opendocumentfellowship.org www.schoolforge.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
