On 1 May 2006 at 21:44, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > This discussions sounds like a patient arguing with a doctor, while > the doctor tell them what they have inside and reasons of what they > have inside. The patient will argue with arguments such as it hurt me > on the lower part of my arm without understanding much of what the > doctor say. This is the same issue with developers and end users > triying to come to reason. I've had doctors prescribe antibiotics automatically for something that wasn't a bacterial infection. Other doctors have said that a drug is a 100% safe even though any scientist will acknowledge that there is no drug that is 100% safe. They didn't listen to their patient and assumed they knew the answer without proper testing. Some doctors think they are God. Is it the same with programmers? > End users see the blinking lights and developers see the actual > processes. End users see what the program will and will not do. They know (at least some of them) what they need and if a particular program fills that need. Developers who do not listen to what end users want will end up missing the boat. OOo.org is a great product and has helped me with the process of becoming Microsoft free. Once I buy a Macintosh the process will be complete. I just hope that the attitude some on this list display will not stop others from leaving Microcrap products. -- Larry I. Gusaas, Moose Jaw, Sask. http://larry-gusaas.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0617-3, 04/28/2006 Tested on: 5/1/2006 10:26:07 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
