-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
> Sees people rushing for the battlefield swinging their axes. ;-) > Was it a dodgy move for Microsoft to register microsoftoffice.com? I mean, > they already own one domain name - and office.microsoft.com is the same > page > as microsoftoffice.com - so they don't really need microsoftoffice.com. > They don't really need Windows.com either, I suppose. But "microsoftoffice.com" is not "officesuites.com". That's the difference that makes it dodgy to me. > I can understand you not liking the ads about OOo being, well, you know... > But I don't get why the domain name bothers you. It's not like he > registered openofficeviewers.com or anything, (which is available it seems, > btw). But he could if he wanted to. Not denying that. He can do what he wants. I just find dodgy what i want. ;-) > But hey, let's just swing our axes some more and see who takes the longest > to fall over dead. Yeehaaaa!!... ;-) André. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEvuR1EOp8fsnyxsQRAqL3AJ41yOix152jqGd7rVTFn+suIBfDFgCfSlAs nPDInV8j0uTUObxNNqXJvb8= =75SZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
