-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
very nice discussion, guys. Interesting. It's nice to see an actual rollout of the problems beyond pure idealistic enthusiasm. ;-) > Hey, don't get me wrong, we're on the same side. What gave you the > impression that I want to discriminate testers? I have nothing against > them or the anonymizer macro. If somebody ever writes it, it will > surely be a great thing. I have just explained why I believe that it's > unlikely to happen, or to be widely used. Well, while I think what you say about the corporate situation is very reasonable, this discussion started with at least one corporate user who would be willing to use the macro. That's a start, i guess. ;-) > Of course PDF export is always a big plus. Defining a color > palette... I've never had any reason to do anything like that in 12 > years I've been working, but surely can be very useful in other > careers/companies. Believe me, your corporate graphic designer, your marketing director and whoever else is concerned about your corporate id would like to slap your head for that remark. ;-) (I as one of them would even wish for OOo to remove every single way to do indiviual formatting and force the user to create or use a predefined style for every even just slightly different way of formatting. But of course this is not reality.) André. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEwEpmEOp8fsnyxsQRAnTkAKDSQLbD72oawG5MVDOTdiQD9U8dqACgtf0m 3jy/gOKXDw8fBJ+POrsXJck= =bHb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
