On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 17:26 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 
> > Shows use of other character map implementations which are not as
> > minimalistic as the OO.o one
> > 
> 
> You're right that impovements are possible.
> However, looking to the number of people I more or less suport in using 
> OOo, and the amount of complaints, I would say it bothers less than 
> 0,1%. Which does not mean that the issue cannot be important.
> But in such situation speaking about sucking, useless, dumb ... well, 
> that's to much for me :-)

We will never please all of the people all of the time but with every
incremental improvement some more will come on board and find it does
what they need. For the developers, choosing the priorities is not easy.
Let's hope they have the wisdom to choose the easier things that are
likely to have the greatest effect first. For 90%+ of word processor
users Writer is already over-kill but we do want to include the last 10%
eventually.

Ian
-- 
www.theINGOTS.org
www.schoolforge.org.uk
www.opendocumentfellowship.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to