Stephan Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > George, Harry G wrote: > > Congratulations on a major OSS project. However... > > In my role as the primary OSS focal for Boeing, I build hundreds of > > OSS > > packages from source, on a lot of platforms. For example I built > > OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 from source tarball on Linux. So I thought I was > > ready for buiilding 2.0.4 on Linux. Nope, it now requires something > > called unowinreg.dll. It won't even configure without that. This is a > > pretty major change for a bump release (2.0.3 to 2.0.4). And it > > doesn't make a Linux guy happy to be forced to use a ".dll" which > > apparently has something to do with the MS Windows Registry. > > [snip] > > 3 Offer (working) build support to only build an OOo and not an SDK. > I regularly build OOo with --disable-odk, without any problems. What exactly breaks, and what's the full configure line? Cheers,
-- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
