Hi Stephan,
>> service DocumentInfo: XDocumentInformation
>> {
>> };
>
> This syntax would mean that language mappings do no offer default
> constructors for that service. Is that intended, or is it a typo
> (dropping the "{}" would enable the default constructors)?
Uh - I wasn't aware of this. I doubt any developer coming from the C++
side would expect such a subtle difference. Wouldn't it make sense to
always generate default constructors?
Ciao
Frank
--
- Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice -
- OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
