Gordon wrote:

> jonathon wrote:
> 
>> 
>> The stated specs are also incredbly misleading, if not outright
>> fraudulent.
> 
> just look here:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sp2/sysreqs.mspx for the minimum
> requirements for XP SP2 - MS are *still* saying you can run it on 64MB
> RAM - the accepted normal for *normal* use is MB....

Whoops - should have been 512 MB.....

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to