Friends,
Thank you for the huge effort everyone has expended to get the word processor component up to the place where it is today. I can only imagine the depth of work that went into the effort. There is no way that any should belittle that work.

However, with that said, there seems to be a major problem with the direction that OpenOffice is taking in the further developmental stages of the product, particularly with regard to Writer.

Having come from using the best of the best, WordPerfect, I am familiar with the fantastic degree of polish that comes from decades of development. Sadly, we users sometimes get rather complacent and demanding of certain aspects of software that attempts to compete with such high standards. By the same token, justified or not, those wishing to compete must be willing to address the issues which are the most blatant with regard to comparisons between products.

In the case of Writer, there seems to be a need to re-examine what should be the next step in the product's development. It is my suggestion that further features be set aside in favor of polishing, and making usable, the existing product. Too many common usability issues are surfacing to make Writer a real contender in the category of word processing.

With the necessity of moving to the Linux environment, the user must have their basic need of a good word processor made available, even if for a fee. Because Writer is given out to many by their choice of OS version, it has become the de facto program of choice. If only it were up to the task.

For instance, if one wishes to use the columns feature, although incomplete and difficult to use, that feature overrides the page layout and makes it impossible to find a way to stop using columns and go back to regular text on that page. The only way it can work in any normal usage situation is to start fresh and make sure that columns are only inserted into existing text so that at least one line exists after the columns.

Of course that is only one example of many I could make. But the issues remains that these things could be easily fixed by going over the existing program as it is now without further feature additions. Whether it be menu layout, feature groupings, or settings locations, clarifying what is there would go much further than expansion of the program at this stage.

Most people only use about 2% of a program's capabilities, and that small group of capabilities must be properly thought out and intuitive to use. This is a big opportunity for the programmers of Writer to step up and polish the existing program, and thereby push it far to the forefront of the genre.

Thanks again for all the hard work, and thank you for your kind consideration of this suggestion.

Best regards,

Michael Kitchen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to