> Eva Pressel-Roemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am an Open Office user at 
> home, but forced to be a MS user at work.
> In most areas I do not find that OO has any particular shortcomings -
> with the exception of the "track changes" feature. It looks pretty
> enough as you are editing, but if I am trying to undo a change or only
> select certain changes, the menu only displays helpful hints such as
> "deleted text"! Well, that could be anything. A little copying from
> the MS features would do no harm here in my opinion.

Hello Eva,

I actually found the track changes feature in OOo better than the
corresponding feature in MSO in the area of reviewing the changes as
it allows several levels of filtering of the changes.

There are indeed however two major improvements that are sorely missed:
a) integration of accept/reject change in the context menu. In MSO,
when right clicking on modified text, it is possible to accept or
reject that particular change, something which I found very useful.
b) in MSO, you can copy the text with revision marks and paste it in a
different document *preserving* the revisions. I could not find a way
to do it in OOo.

Another little thing that I find useful in MSO is the possibility of
toggling the recording of changes from the status bar (TRK). As there
is currently a fair amount of free space on the status bar, it would
be nice to add this information/switch.

Point a) is covered in 6191 and more general enhancements can be found
in 14268, 25028, 50202, 58839, 58841, 63135, 66293.
Point b) is covered (partially) in 34537.

My suggestion is that people who still have votes available should go
on and vote for one or more of these RFEs.

Cheers,

Michele

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to