M. Fioretti wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +0000, jonathon wrote:
> 
> (four times)
>> Styles are not being correctly used.
> 
> since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
> issues, then maybe OOo/ODF styles are very poorly advertised and
> documented, but this is a side topic.
> 
> The OP clearly said that this is a problem of interoperability with MS
> Office users and/or documents. So maybe this is not really a case
> where OOo/ODF styles aren't correctly used: this is a case where such
> styles have never been used, because they didn't exist where those
> documents were created; and maybe a case where such styles simply
> _cannot_ be used, because such information is lost every time a file
> goes in .doc format back and forth between OOo and MS Office
> users. Are we sure this isn't the case here?
That's right. The old documents were .doc and they have to remain .doc
because of interoperability with other entities.

> 
>> >  No politics in this case, simply a office with to much power.
>> 
>> It is an office that does not know how to use their tools correctly.
> 
> Maybe OOo is not _their_ chosen tool: from the initial message it is
> not to be excluded that IT tried to switch users without them asking
> for it or even knowing when the switch would happen. There are cases
> where migration was indeed done this way, nobody noticed or complained
> and a few people where even really happy that "the last version of MS
> Office finally doesn't crash and runs quite faster"!
They did know, they even got short courses but they did not really
understand that there are incompatibilities.

> 
> But of course, it all depends on how complex the existing MS Office
> files are and on how much the users have to interact, editing files
> together, with external MS Office users.
They are not that complex. There are even very simple documents that look
different on ooo.  

Bye
Andreas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to