On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 21:39, Riley wrote: > You are exactly correct Eberhard. Technically not an Open Office > responsibility. > However, #1 as an "open source" right up OO's alley
It would be much closer to Debian/Ubuntu/NetBSD's alley, than OOo's. > and #2 if there is a lacking of the program being written correctly now sold > us from store shelves, What you describe sounds like part of the feature set of the file system used in Solaris, and OpenSolaris. >Simply put, it adds several layers of Value... that would likely result in an >increased donation to be shared by the OO team. About the only way to correlate donations to specific features, is if they are implemented on a bounty basis. Currently, OOo development does not have a mechanism in place for utilizing that model. jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
