On 12/10/2009, NoOp ([email protected]) wrote: > On 12/10/2009 04:22 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > ... >> >> The correct solution is for either ezmlm to be patched to accommodate >> BATV address tagging (we are NOT the only ones using it I assure you),
> http://www.ezmlm.org/archive/7.0.2/CHANGES > ezmlm-idx-7.0.1, 2009-07-09 > =========================== > > - Added support for decoding sender addresses mangled by BATV prvs. Ok, so who gets the bug report that this is not working for the users list? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
