On 2010-09-29, Robert Funnell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Phil Hibbs wrote: > >> Harold Fuchs: >>> So, am I being >>> paranoid in thinking that the choice of the name "LibreOffice" suggests that >>> at some stage it will no longer be Gratis? >> >> Yup. > > This does seem a bit paranoid. 'Libre' nicely emphasizes the 'free > speech' aspect. Isn't the 'free beer' aspect assured by the GPL > licence?
As long as you don't mind compiling it yourself. On linux this isn't a huge issue, but on Windows I seem to recall that a proprietary compiler is required. -- -John ([email protected]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
