On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:18:43AM +0100, Christian Fischer wrote: > On Saturday 27 November 2010 23:52:20 Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Was the problem and solution anything worth documenting so that we could > > help others to avoid this problem in the future? > > the problem was self made. > Having the same mtu for physical interfaces like the virtual interface mtu > (ovs, both 1500) isn't a good idea if one likes to use VLANs. 1518 is a > reasonable value. > > Well, both, mtu_setting() from InterfaceReconfigure.py and ovs-vsctl > add port, have configured 1500 bytes, but I haven't verified the > settings, and therefore it was my fault.
I'm surprised that this was necessary. Most NIC drivers allow an extra 4 bytes when a VLAN tag is present. What driver does your NIC use? _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
