Hi Ben, For some reason that added route does not send packets to the dp0 interface. (Any idea's? I'm still looking around. I enabled log_martians on everything and nothing is showing up there).
Once that packet gets to dp0 I can have the controller set the packet to have the client (192.168.1.3) ip address. Thanks again! Aaron On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Aaron Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there anyway to prevent this from happening if I want to send the >> packet to 192.168.1.2? I tried removing the ip address at dp0 (which >> was 192.168.1.2) and then adding a route for this subnetwork out dev >> dp0 but packets don't seem to follow this route. An ICMP message of >> host 192.168.1.2 unreachable is just sent back. > > I guess I don't understand what behavior you actually want. Adding a > route for 192.168.1.0 on dp0 should cause packets destined to 192.168.1.2 > to be forwarded out the Ethernet interface that is also attached to > the same bridge where dp0 is attached. Is there a machine attached to > that network that has IP 192.168.1.2? If not then I'd understand why a > host unreachable would eventually show up after ARP couldn't locate that > machine. > -- Aaron O. Rosen Masters Student - Network Communication 306B Fluor Daniel 843.425.9777 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_openvswitch.org
