On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > With all that taken into account, here is a new version. On Linux, I > prefer the fchmod() based solution, because someday OVS may have to > add support for threads and the umask is not thread-local.
Doesn't this just introduce another portability problem? If we do introduce threads then it will be less likely that we notice it since things will work fine on Linux. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
