Now, I verified and found that XenServer Kernel version
(2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.323.170596xen ) is different from
DDK Kernel version (2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588xen). Hope it will
solve my problem.

Thanks,
Ramana Reddy.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Ramana Reddy <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have given the following values
>
>    VERSION=1.1.1
>    KERNEL_NAME=xen
>    KERNEL_VERSION=2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588
>    KERNEL_FLAVOR=xen
>
> After running
> rpmbuild \
>         -D "openvswitch_version $VERSION" \
>         -D "kernel_name $KERNEL_NAME" \
>         -D "kernel_version $KERNEL_VERSION" \
>         -D "kernel_flavor $KERNEL_FLAVOR" \
>         -bb openvswitch-$VERSION/xenserver/openvswitch-xen.spec
>
> It successfully generated the files:
> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/openvswitch-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
> Wrote:
> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/openvswitch-modules-xen-2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
> Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/openvswitch-debuginfo-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
>
> Once I copied the first two rpm files and installed on XenServer 5.6 Fp1
> using rpm -U command
> it giving the following error messages:
>
> #rpm -U openvswitch-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
> openvswitch-modules-xen-2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
>
> error: Failed dependencies:
>     kernel-xen = 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588 is needed by
> openvswitch-modules-xen-2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588-1.1.1-1.i386
>
> I have verified the contents in rpm files, and there is only one .ko module
> in
> openvswitch-modules-xen-2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm
>
>
> That is
>
> /lib/modules/2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs5.6.100.314.170588xen/extra/openvswitch/openvswitch_mod.ko
>
> What is wrong in that, why dependency problem is coming. Is there any thing
> missing.
>
> Help in this regards is highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Ramana Reddy.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to