On Thursday, July 21, 2011 06:35:21 PM Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Roberto Sassu <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > i'm doing some experiments with the GRE capability
> > of Openvswitch.
> >
> > I've setup two virtual machines with IP:
> >
> > VM 1 (eth0): 192.168.122.119
> > VM 2 (eth0): 192.168.110.142
> >
> > each connected to its own bridge:
> >
> > VM 1 -> virbr0 (192.168.122.1)
> > VM 2 -> virbr1 (192.168.110.1)
> >
> > I've setup the host in a way that from
> > one VM i can ping the other.
> >
> > Then i configured two bridges in the VMs with a
> > GRE port and i've set their IP to:
> >
> > VM 1 (br0): 10.1.22.1
> > VM 2 (br0): 10.1.22.2
> >
> > Unfortunately, i'm not able to ping the
> > other VM using one of the above IP.
> >
> > This is the tcpdump output of VM 1 if i try to
> > execute from the VM 2:
> >
> > ping 10.1.22.1
> >
> > ------
> > 11:38:04.985766 IP 192.168.122.1 > 192.168.122.119: GREv0, length 46: ARP, 
> > Request who-has 10.1.22.1 tell 10.1.22.2, length 28
> > 11:38:04.985826 IP 192.168.122.119 > 192.168.122.1: ICMP 192.168.122.119 
> > protocol 47 port 25944 unreachable, length 74
> 

Hi Jesse

many thanks, it works!

The VM networks are configured for NAT, so that's why there is the
host IP in the dump.

So, i configured the VMs to reside in the same virtual network,
changed the ovs bridge configuration on one side and i'm able
to ping the other bridge.

Roberto Sassu


> GRE does a lookup on the incoming source address to identify what
> tunnel the packet should be decapsulated into.  The IP that it expects
> is the same as the remote_ip you configured to use to send packets.
> If it doesn't find any matching tunnels then it sends an ICMP port
> unreachable.
> 
> Since the sender is the address of the host and not the VM I'm
> guessing that either you configured the wrong bridge or are doing some
> kind of address translation.
> 
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to