On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:11:57PM -0400, Nicholas Bastin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 15:05, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It seems reasonable to me, if it solves David's problem. > > Well, it solves other problems too.. :-) (It mirrors an in-band mode that > indigo has, so if you already are tagging your in-band control traffic, it > makes sense to match that with more specific rules). I think we can all > agree that the most-specific in-band rules are best, as long as those rules > actually capture all your in-band traffic (the hard part). No reason we > can't ask the user for some help here.
If you want to implement it and (this is important) test it, and the implementation is clean enough that it's clear it doesn't break anything else, then it seems reasonable to accept it. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
