That's correct but please don't drop on the mailing list in your responses.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Aishwarya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Let me know if the following is correct according to what you explained: > > > Initially, host1 has physical ip address 10.0.0.1(eth0 on the physical > host). The vm on host1 has ip address 192.168.0.1(eth0 on the vm) > > Now I create an interface tap0 on host1(which is specified for the vm when > it starts up) and also a bridge br0. I add the tap0 port to br0. now, i > remove the ip address of eth0 and assign the ip address 10.0.0.1 to br0. Is > that right? > > I repeat the same on host 2. > > Thanks, > Aish > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Aishwarya <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Jesse, >> > I dont understand... do i need to add eth0 to the bridge or not? Also, >> > ultimately I want these vms to talk over the network... i.e. vm1 located >> > on >> > host1 should be able to talk to vm2 located on host2 where host1 and >> > host2 >> > are connected over a network to each other... Could you elaborate a >> > little >> > bit more on what you mean? >> >> You need to move the IP address, which is independent of the Ethernet >> interface. The physical interface needs to be part of the bridge as >> do the VM interfaces. The IP address needs to be on the bridge >> interface, which is created automatically and is used to connect to >> the hypervisor. > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
