On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:42:07PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 > Do you happen to know whether this is commonly done in practice? It > would make maintenance easier, if we could use it, but I want to use > "best practices" for RPM packaging, to the extent that I can figure > out what that is. Definitely, having unpackaged files generate an error is good for automated builds - if something goes wrong you'll have to investigate it. But this could be annoying during development process or while building custom RPMs. However, disabling this error will still generate warning, you'll see list of unpackaged files.
So, instead of adding %define to spec, I'd recommend running "rpmbuild -D '_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0' openvswitch.spec" when needed. -- Regards, -- Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
