I don't think there's a problem. I'd guess if you looked at the output of ovs-ofctl speaking OpenFlow, you'd see the mask as defined in the spec. However, we've made the user interface more intuitive to users, so it uses normal CIDR masks.
--Justin On Jan 27, 2012, at 1:11 AM, edward wilson wrote: > HI, > I am using openvswitch 1.2.2 on my linux 2.6.38 fedora machine. > I added following flow on switch > > ovs-ofctl add-flows br0 "dl_type=0x0800 nw_proto=1 nw_dst=10.0.3.4 > nw_src=10.1.3.2/8 actions=1" > > Now when i use ovs-ofctl dump-flows br1, it shows > > cookie=0x0, duration=3.855s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, > icmp,nw_dst=10.0.3.4,nw_src=10.0.0.0/8 actions=NORMAL > > > Now openvswitch interpret this wildcard mask as CIDR suffix, and it has > wildcarded 24 least significant bits, first 8 bits are non-wildcard > But as per openflow 1.0 spec wildcard mask is interpreted as CIDR suffix with > opposite meaning , i.e suffix of 8 should wildcard least significant 8 bits > of ip address. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
