It had bugs that we did not want to invest time in fixing, and we did not want to continue to have to maintain it.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:46:14AM +0530, sachin sharma wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > Thanks. I am using openvswitch version 1.3.0. There is no ovs-openflowd > present in that version. I think, with that it is possible to separate the > user space of two datapath units like br0 and br1. Is there any specific > reason that ovs-openflowd is removed from the current version? > > Best Regards, > Sachin > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > To: sachin sharma <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 27 January 2012 5:56 PM > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] setting up br0 and br1 > > No. > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:12:29PM +0530, sachin sharma wrote: > > Dear Ben, > > Thanks for the answer. However, I want to separate user-space of both br0 > > and br1. Is there any other way to do that? > > > > Best Regards, > > Sachin > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > > To: sachin sharma <[email protected]> > > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, 27 January 2012 4:33 PM > > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] setting up br0 and br1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:14:54PM +0530, sachin sharma wrote: > > > I have tested ovs-vswitchd behavior with the instruction given in > > > INSTALL.Linux. This is working fine. In this configuration, I have two > > > datapath elements, br0 and br1, linked with the same ovs-vswitchd > > > daemon. > > > > > > > > > However, now I am interested to have br0 and br1 linked with two > > > different ovs-vswitchd daemon. So I followed following instructions. > > > > Don't do that. Use only one ovs-vswitchd per host, regardless of the > > number of bridges. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
