The specificity of the flow doesn't matter; feel free to check the OpenFlow 1.0 
spec if you'd like. 

--Justin


On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:09 PM, selen jia <[email protected]> wrote:

> But icmp rule is more exact and has icmp_type=0  icmp_code=0 and nw_proto=1  
> field as well. So i think all these rule parametres should match against 
> packet fields.and icmp rule should match to the icmp(0,0) packet and not rule 
> containing just dl_type=0x0800(ip) parameter.
> 
> in ovs code we use memcmp(flow,packet_flow) to determine rule matching the 
> packet, so i still believe icmp rule should match the packet and not ip rule
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Justin Pettit <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Adding back the discuss@ mailing list.]
> 
> If there are overlapping rules at the same priority, a switch is free to 
> choose whichever one it wants.  In the example you gave, an ICMP (0,0) packet 
> would match both rules, since it is both IP and has the correct ICMP type and 
> code.  If you ran a ping, the echo requests and replies would only match the 
> IP rule, since it has different ICMP types.  If you want your special ICMP 
> packets to consistently match the right rule you need to raise its priority 
> relative to the IP rule.
> 
> --Justin
> 
> 
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 2:17 AM, selen jia wrote:
> 
> > That means during add-flow in flow table, rules can be added in any 
> > order,there is no defined way how rule is added to flow table.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Justin Pettit <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think you need to disambiguate those rules by using a priority.  OpenFlow 
> > doesn't distinguish based on which rule is more specific, so switch 
> > behavior is undefined in those situations.
> >
> > As described in the ovs-ofctl man page, you can use "check_overlap" to see 
> > whether this situation will occur at flow insertion time.  The controller 
> > may have a similar flag you can set.
> >
> > --Justin
> >
> >
> > On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:42 AM, selen jia wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > > im using openvswitch 1.2.2 and setting controller ptcp:6633
> > >
> > > now from controller i add following flows
> > > 1. ovs-ofctl add-flow tcp:15.1.2.3 "ip actions=output:2"
> > > 2. ovs-ofctl add-flow tcp: 15:1.2.3 "icmp icmp_type=0 icmp_code=0 
> > > actions=output:2"
> > >
> > > Now when i send packet with icmp type=0 and icmp code=0 ,
> > > packet matches rule 1) with ip actions=2 and not with second rule  icmp 
> > > icmp_type=0 and icmp_code=0
> > >
> > > although rule 2 was exact match rule for packet..
> > >
> > >
> > > How ever when i add these two flows from switch ,packet matches icmp rule 
> > > only.
> > >
> > > why is switch behaving this way with random rule insertion and matching? 
> > > also rule insertion order is different form switch and controller?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to