On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 05:07:42PM +0400, Konstantin Khorenko wrote: > On 07/06/2012 06:11 AM, Jesse Gross wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Konstantin Khorenko<[email protected]> > >wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>we'd like to add the Open vSwitch kernel module to OpenVZ kernel, > >>in order to do that we've backported the appropriate code from mainstream > >>kernel. > >> > >>It turned out that the vport-patch functionality could be also very useful > >>for us, > >>so we are looking for possibility to include it to our kernel as well. > >> > >>Unfortunately mainstream does not have vport-patch functionality at the > >>moment and > >>porting vport-patch related code from openvswitch.org git and incorporating > >>it into > >>the code taken from mainstream appeared to be not a straightforward task. > >> > >>On the other hand i've found that Open vSwitch FAQ says: > >>"Work is in progress in adding these features ["patch" in particular] to the > >>upstream Linux version of the Open vSwitch kernel module." > > > >The FAQ doesn't contain the phrase that you added in brackets so what > >you have here is very misleading. The work that this refers to is > >tunneling. > > Well, i really appreciate your clarification about this, honestly i > was under impression that those paragraphs are not only about > tunneling, may be it's worth to make the sentences a bit more precise > so nobody misreads them like me.
It was ambiguous. I sent out a clarification patch (you are CCed). _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
