Thanks, I will read more carefully. I have a host IP by assigning one to br10. How is it different to assign to vlan10 (as an internal type interface)?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:20:58AM +0300, Göktuğ YILDIRIM wrote: > > May I ask if I miss the documentation or is it undocumented? I'd like to > > read more if there is... > > The database is documented in ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5). > The ovs-vsctl command is documented in ovs-vsctl(8). > > > For example there is one that I am curious of why need to use internal > type > > interface. > > You don't have to. > > > I am trying to setup a simple switch to vlan my VMs and as far > > as I see it is possible to make subset of bridges as below. > > ******************************** > > ovs-vsctl add-br br0 > > ovs-vsctl add-br br10 br0 10 > > ovs-vsctl add-br br20 br0 20 > > ******************************** > > Then you add br10 or br20 to the related VM config. > > Sure, that works. > > > However there is seems to be another way that uses below example. In > fact I > > could not find a way to work with it (as in KVM). > > > *********************************************************************************** > > ovs-vsctl add-port br0 vlan10 tag=10 -- set Interface vlan10 > type=internal > > ifconfig vlan10 192.168.0.123 > > > ********************************************************************************** > > That's how you'd put a host IP on the VLAN. See the FAQ: > http://openvswitch.org/faq/ >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
