On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:20:34AM -0700, Maru Newby wrote: > I'm happy to report that my use-case is no longer relevant. I > incorrectly assumed that running the Quantum dhcp agent in dom0 was > preferable to running in an unprivileged domain. It still might > make sense to avoid unnecessary modification of standalone tap > ports, though. Despite XAPI not supporting the addition of a > standalone tap, it is possible to add one directly via ovs commands.
In general ovs-xapi-sync takes charge of iface-id, iface-status, and so on in an XenServer/XCP environment. I'd really rather figure out what's appropriate for other use cases when one actually comes up. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
