Sorry, maybe it was my mistake....I copy what we told before to keep
everything on the mailing list...
Anyway...I told you that because it seems an error of interfaces
configuration....this doesn't necessary means that it can't work at all....
What do you mean with gateway? Are you talking about the switch
interface connected to the controller, or what?
Can you specify the type of message you see through wireshark?
Il 13/03/2013 09:38, ??? ha scritto:
Hi,
I am not saying about the network does not work.
It works.
I can reach the internet when I have a gateway.
But I think switch should not flood the packet_in to all the port.
I am not sure that switch may change to the flooding mod to push the
packet_in to controller.<----guess
I do not want the vm to get any packet that the dst_mac is not its.
Thank you for your reply, and sorry about my poor English.
Faithfulman
2013/3/13 Luca Prete <luca.pr...@garr.it <mailto:luca.pr...@garr.it>>
Hi!
Are you sure the ovs is properly configured?
I use to set the static IP on eth0 and the other NIC going to the
hosts or to other OVSs are set like this:
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet manual
up ifconfig eth1 up
Usually (but I don't know if it metters...) I use two different IP
classes for the switches-controller network and the users network.
Just check and try....and report if you can what happens...
Cheers,
Luca P.
Il 13/03/2013 09:07, ??? ha scritto:
Hi,
I am trying to use floodlight controller to control the
openvswitch(1.7.3).
And I did not change the configuration in floodlight.
controller(10.0.0.11)<----->openvswitch(10.0.0.12)
------->VM1(10.0.0.13)
L------->VM2(10.0.0.14)
This is my topology.
I know controller will push packet_out or flow_mod to help switch
to forward the message,and it works.
After doing this,I install the wireshark to capture the packet
on vm1's port eth0.
It does the reasonable work at in the beginning,VM1 gets the
packet which dst mac=VM1.
But after a while,VM1 get the packet from 10.0.0.12 to 10.0.0.11.
I have no idea why switch flood the packet_in to all the port.
I am sure Floodlight did not push the flow_mod to flood the
packet_in.
("ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0" did not show any flooding actions)
Is this a reasonable behavior of switch?
What happened?
Best.
Faithfulman
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org <mailto:discuss@openvswitch.org>
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Il 13/03/2013 09:07, ??? ha scritto:
Hi,
I am trying to use floodlight controller to control the
openvswitch(1.7.3).
And I did not change the configuration in floodlight.
controller(10.0.0.11)<----->openvswitch(10.0.0.12) ------->VM1(10.0.0.13)
L------->VM2(10.0.0.14)
This is my topology.
I know controller will push packet_out or flow_mod to help switch to
forward the message,and it works.
After doing this,I install the wireshark to capture the packet on
vm1's port eth0.
It does the reasonable work at in the beginning,VM1 gets the packet
which dst mac=VM1.
But after a while,VM1 get the packet from 10.0.0.12 to 10.0.0.11.
I have no idea why switch flood the packet_in to all the port.
I am sure Floodlight did not push the flow_mod to flood the packet_in.
("ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0" did not show any flooding actions)
Is this a reasonable behavior of switch?
What happened?
Best.
Faithfulman
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
