Hello, If you were to add in support for multiple tables for replace-flows and diff-flows what changes do you think need to be made? We are still looking at the code but some direction would be most helpful. ____________________________________________
Kris Lindgren Senior Linux Systems Engineer GoDaddy, LLC. This email message and any attachment(s) hereto are intended for use only by its intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 7:58 PM To: Kris G. Lindgren Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-ofctl replace-flows Excuse me, I made it sound like this is a general problem with ovs-ofctl. In fact it is specific to replace-flows and diff-flows. On Jun 3, 2013 6:56 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@nicira.com<mailto:b...@nicira.com>> wrote: Ovs-ofctl isn't really aware of multiple tables and will screw them up if you use them. This is a long standing personal to-do item of mine. If you want to submit a patch to fix it, I would very much appreciate it. On May 31, 2013 5:15 PM, "Kris G. Lindgren" <klindg...@godaddy.com<mailto:klindg...@godaddy.com>> wrote: Hello all, I am trying to use the ovs-ofctl replace-flows command to add flows from a file that includes multiple tables. However, I am running into some issues. First, when it works all the flows are added into table 0 and the table that is specified in the flow is ignored: [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# ovs-ofctl del-flows xenbr0-int [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# echo "table=1 action=normal" table=1 action=normal [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# echo "table=1 action=normal" > asdf [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows xenbr0-int NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# ovs-ofctl replace-flows xenbr0-int asdf [root@g1dlgenlab07 ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows xenbr0-int NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=1.584s, table=0, n_packets=2998, n_bytes=128786, idle_age=0, actions=NORMAL I have tried: Table=1,action=normal Table=1 action=normal Table=1, action=normal I have also tried specifying the flow format of "any", without any luck. Second, most of the time that I run the above flow I loose connectivity to the machine. The ip for the machine is bound to xenbr0 (not xenbr0-int) which is also an OVS bridge. So whatever is going on seems to effect ovs as a whole. Running ovs-ofctl del-flows xenbr0-int will restore access to the machine. From KVM on the machine if I run a ovs-ofctl dump-flows xenbr0-int I can see the rule was added to table 0 and is matching packets, but connectivity to the ip on xenbr0 is still denied. I am using ovs 1.10. What am I missing something here? Regards, Kris Lindgren _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:discuss@openvswitch.org> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
