No you do not need to do that.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Prashant Chougule <[email protected]>wrote: > do i need to add route for br1 as per above example, because in my route > table gateway is 0.0.0.0 for both bridges. > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Alex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Prashant, >> >> I just repeated your configuration on two machines. And it works. >> >> My ovs is the master branch from here: >> http://git.openvswitch.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openvswitch;a=summary >> >> """ >> # eth1 on two machines are directly connected >> # eth1 on machine1 has address 2.2.2.2 >> # eth1 on machine2 has address 2.2.2.3 >> # Below is the script on machine1: >> vs-vsctl add-br br0 -- add-port br0 eth1 >> sudo ifconfig br0 2.2.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> sudo ifconfig eth1 0 up >> ovs-vsctl add-br br1 >> sudo ifconfig br1 11.11.11.25 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> ovs-vsctl add-port br1 gre0 -- set interface gre0 type=gre >> options:remote_ip=2.2.2.2 >> """ >> Is this the same as yours? If it is, seems to be caused by other >> misconfig. >> And you may need to use commands like tcpdump, ovs-dpctl dump-flows, route >> for debugging. >> You may refer to this thread for ways of debugging: >> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-July/010440.html >> >> Kind Regards, >> Alex Wang, >> > > > > -- > Thanks &Regards, > Prashant Chougule. >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
