>On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:51:33AM +0000, Yinpeijun wrote:
>> Hello everyone, Recently, I use openvswitch-2.0.0 to test send packets
>> between the vms, duration the test I use valgrind to
>>
>> catch if there is memory leak in ovs-vswitched process , after test I see
>> the valgrind log as follow :
>>
>> ==12453== Invalid read of size 8
>> ==12453== at 0x424B06: handle_flow_misses (ofproto-dpif.c:3501)
>> ==12453== by 0x425A3A: handle_upcalls (ofproto-dpif.c:3632)
>> ==12453== by 0x425C7D: type_run_fast (ofproto-dpif.c:1041)
>> ==12453== by 0x412651: ofproto_type_run_fast (ofproto.c:1332)
>> ==12453== by 0x406AC4: bridge_run_fast (bridge.c:2384)
>> ==12453== by 0x40D8ED: main (ovs-vswitchd.c:117)
>> ==12453== Address 0x8122820 is 1,120 bytes inside a block of size 1,144
>> free'd
>> ==12453== at 0x4C263F0: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:446)
>> ==12453== by 0x424948: handle_flow_misses (ofproto-dpif.c:4599)
>> ==12453== by 0x425A3A: handle_upcalls (ofproto-dpif.c:3632)
>> ==12453== by 0x425C7D: type_run_fast (ofproto-dpif.c:1041)
>> ==12453== by 0x412651: ofproto_type_run_fast (ofproto.c:1332)
>> ==12453== by 0x406AC4: bridge_run_fast (bridge.c:2384)
>> ==12453== by 0x40D8ED: main (ovs-vswitchd.c:117)
>>
>> ==12453== Invalid write of size 4
>> ==12453== at 0x424B41: handle_flow_misses (ofproto-dpif.c:3507)
>> ==12453== by 0x425A3A: handle_upcalls (ofproto-dpif.c:3632)
>> ==12453== by 0x425C7D: type_run_fast (ofproto-dpif.c:1041)
>> ==12453== by 0x412651: ofproto_type_run_fast (ofproto.c:1332)
>> ==12453== by 0x406AC4: bridge_run_fast (bridge.c:2384)
>> ==12453== by 0x40D8ED: main (ovs-vswitchd.c:117)
>> ==12453== Address 0x8122828 is 1,128 bytes inside a block of size 1,144
>> free'd
>> ==12453== at 0x4C263F0: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:446)
>> ==12453== by 0x424948: handle_flow_misses (ofproto-dpif.c:4599)
>> ==12453== by 0x425A3A: handle_upcalls (ofproto-dpif.c:3632)
>> ==12453== by 0x425C7D: type_run_fast (ofproto-dpif.c:1041)
>> ==12453== by 0x412651: ofproto_type_run_fast (ofproto.c:1332)
>> ==12453== by 0x406AC4: bridge_run_fast (bridge.c:2384)
>> ==12453== by 0x40D8ED: main (ovs-vswitchd.c:117)
>>
>> then I find the code as follow:
>>
>> if (list_is_empty(&facet->subfacets)) {
>> subfacet = &facet->one_subfacet;
>> } else {
>> subfacet = subfacet_find(backer, key, key_len, key_hash);
>> if (subfacet) {
>> if (subfacet->facet == facet) {
>> return subfacet;
>> }
>>
>> /* This shouldn't happen. */
>> VLOG_ERR_RL(&rl, "subfacet with wrong facet");
>> subfacet_destroy(subfacet);
>> }
>> So , I should annotation or delete the code above? Any advice on this
>> would be greatly appreciated.
>
>This is certainly a bug that should be fixed, but I'm having trouble matching
>up the line numbers in the valgrind output above with the code that you
>quoted. What are the line numbers for the code you quoted above? Are you
>using exactly the openvswitch 2.0.0 release,
>or a different release, or a modified version of some release?
Thank you for your reply Ben.
sorry for my mistake ,I exactly use a openvswitch 2.0.0 release but I have
added some our own code, and the valgrind output above match the line numbers
as follow:
3465 static void
3466 handle_flow_misses(struct dpif_backer *backer, struct flow_miss_batch
*fmb)
3467 {
3468 struct flow_miss_op flow_miss_ops[FLOW_MISS_MAX_BATCH];
3469 struct dpif_op *dpif_ops[FLOW_MISS_MAX_BATCH];
3470 struct flow_miss *miss;
size_t n_ops, i;
/* Process each element in the to-do list, constructing the set
of
* operations to batch. */
n_ops = 0;
HMAP_FOR_EACH (miss, hmap_node, &fmb->misses) {
handle_flow_miss(miss, flow_miss_ops, &n_ops);
}
...........
3487 for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++) {
....... ............
3501 if (subfacet->dp_packet_count || subfacet->dp_byte_count) {
3502 VLOG_ERR_RL(&rl, "failed to install subfacet for which "
3503 "datapath reported hits");
3504 subfacet->dp_packet_count = subfacet->dp_byte_count = 0;
3505 }
3506
3507 subfacet->path = SF_NOT_INSTALLED;
3508 }
3509 }
4576 static struct subfacet *
4577 subfacet_create(struct facet *facet, struct flow_miss *miss)
4578 {
4579 struct dpif_backer *backer = miss->ofproto->backer;
4580 enum odp_key_fitness key_fitness = miss->key_fitness;
const struct nlattr *key = miss->key;
.......
if (list_is_empty(&facet->subfacets)) {
subfacet = &facet->one_subfacet;
...... } else {
subfacet = subfacet_find(backer, key, key_len, key_hash);
if (subfacet) {
if (subfacet->facet == facet) {
return subfacet;
}
4596
4597 /* This shouldn't happen. */
4598 VLOG_ERR_RL(&rl, "subfacet with wrong facet");
4599 subfacet_destroy(subfacet);
}
........
so , I want to know how to fix it ? Look forward to your reply
thanks
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
