On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote: > Hey Andrey, > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> during transition from 2.1.3 to the 2.3.1 (both userspace and kernel >> module) the 'first ping lost' appeared with completely static reactive >> flows, so I am still investigating it, > > > Could you provide more info on when you did ping? (i.e. after upgraded > both userspace and kernel module, or after upgraded just one of them), > > >> >> because this behavior can >> affect flow lifecycle with mixed proactive+reactive scheme. If anyone >> is interested in some kind of debugging output for this exact issue, >> please ask me. Hopefully I`ll be able to fix this soon and will report >> on the original issue. > > > Feel free to post any debug info,
Hello list, Alex, everything was ok on head of branch-2.1, moreover, branch-2.3 is preferred now (except counter bug I just reported) because of lower cpu usage with proactive flows. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
