Andy/Scott, Thanks for your responses. My initial understanding was wrong. I should have assigned the IP to the bridge and not the individual interfaces.
Nagaravind On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Scott Lowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Please see my response below. > > > aravind C <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am using the following setup to test interface bonding with OVS. >> >> VM1 | VM2 >> >> (10.10.10.2/16) (10.10.10.3/16) >> eth1 ========== eth1 >> / \ >> / \ >> bond0 bond0 >> \ / >> \ / >> eth2 ========== eth2 >> (10.10.20.2/16) (10.10.20.3/16) >> >> I can see that - >> 1. lacp status is negotiated >> 2. On both VMs initially eth1 is enabled and eth2 is the active slave >> >> Is my assumption wrong that I should be able to ping either of the >> bonded interfaces in VM2 from VM1? >> - ping shows that the currently active interface is used to send out >> requests. >> - tcpdump shows that the arp requests are received by the active >> interface in VM2. No reply is generated. >> >> Can anyone please explain what is wrong in my configuration? > > > > Perhaps I'm completely misunderstanding what you're trying to accomplish > here, but as I understand it you'd want the IP address assigned to the bond, > not the individual interfaces that are members of the bond. > > -- > Scott > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
