Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Hi Ben, If we use group type "indirect" instead of "all", multiple egress ports in output action would still fail, right?
thanks -----Original Message----- From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:22 PM To: Ramalingham, Kavitha Cc: [email protected]; K, Kalaiselvi; Sindagi, Rajesh; Venkataraghavan, C; Balasubram, Vasanthan; Manivasagam, Mahesh Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Issue with Broadcast Group On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:42:33PM +0530, [email protected] wrote: > I tested with the below mentioned topology, having a broadcast flow > whose actions were set to broadcast group ID. When I tried to ping > from host h1 to h2, ARP request packet is sent out to only one port > and not to all ports. We have created a group of type "all" with the > egress ports set to port3 and port4. The expectation here is that any > flow that uses this group has to egress the traffic on both the ports. > In the below tcpdump capture you can see that ARP-Request traffic goes > out of port4 and not thro' port3. Your "all" group has one bucket with two output actions. That's a mistake, because OpenFlow says that the actions in a bucket are an "action set", meaning that only one action of each type can be effective. The solution is to use two buckets, each with one output action.
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
