Thanks! I'll definitively check that out. Looks very complete. Hm, ok. So, imagine a case where I want that a switch forwards certain "controller-to-switch reply messages" (barrier reply, bundle commit reply) to all controllers, e.g., using GROUP ALL as action.
As far as I know, a controller can't install a rule with higher priority than the in-band rules to achieve this. Can such rules be created in any other way? Or it is completely impossible? Justin Pettit <[email protected]> escreveu no dia sexta, 18/12/2015 às 23:54: > > > On Dec 17, 2015, at 8:44 AM, André Mantas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Yes, I did found that info in > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/FAQ.md > > > > The problem is, in an in-band scenario, will the messages to the > controllers *always* be processed by those hidden flows? > > Yes. You can find all the gory details in the "In-Band Control" section > here: > > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/DESIGN.md > > > And can I modify such flows as I wish? > > No. You can only disable in-band control entirely. > > --Justin > > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
