On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:01:10PM +0000, Toth, Andrew wrote: > Regrettably OVN will not fit our situation. In the NFV world today, > there is a push to separate the fast path data plane processing from > the slower path configuration control processing. The common > understanding is to put the data path processing on its own processor > as a separate process (possibly multiple data plane processes on > multiple processors) with cached data (flows in the emc in the case of > OVS) and communicate back to the control plane data store when the > required information is not in the cache. For our current project we > need an open source VNF that is decomposed in this way. I just want to > ensure that this separation is not already being done by the OVS > community before we go through the task of separating OVS into these > two components for our scenario.
Isn't OVS already built this way? _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
