All,

The Motor Industry Software Reliability Association (MISRA),
www.misra.org.uk, published a set of C coding guidelines a few years
ago.  These have proved popular and there have been a number of
guideline forum (attended by about 50-70 people).

The next meeting is on 18 October in Coventry.

Most of their guidelines are based on technical issues.  Hopefully
more cognitively based ones will appear in the years to come.

There are other ppig issues associated with guidelines.  Like
programmers attitudes to being made to follow them, how an
organisation integrates them into its practices (or not).  There is
a deviation mechanism, how do developers use it, is it seen
as a convenient get out or useful escape hatch in emergencies?

There are often groups of people there from companies and
sometimes their suspicion can be overpowering.  Why do
we have to use these guidelines, we are not doing anything
wrong, who is going to see the results?

Things are not helped by the presence of half a dozen or
so vendors trying to sell them tools.

These guidelines are used by very large manufacturing companies
who have large development groups.  The sort of people who might
fork out for some research.

To get your foot in the door you will have to get to Coventry and
cough up �50 (it was around that last time, I don't know if they have
academic rates) under your own steam.

derek

--
Derek M Jones                                            tel: +44 (0) 1252 
520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applications Standards Conformance Testing   http://www.knosof.co.uk



- Automatic footer for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]  unsubscribe discuss
To join the announcements list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe announce
To receive a help file, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]         help
This list is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40ppig.org/
If you have any problems or questions, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to