Derek M Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        With regard to remembering what they have learned.  Perhaps you
        would be interested in running this
        www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/accu06a.pdf experiment on your students.
        
I've printed that paper and read it carefully.
Some comments:

    1.  "parenthesis" is singular.  The plural is "parentheses".
        It's not an unusual pattern in English:
        crisis/crises, amanuensis/amanuenses, analysis/analyses,
        thesis/theses, axis/axes, arsis/arses (I refer of course
        to a technical term in poetry).

        "affect"/"effect" can also be found, and many others.

    2.  The experiment made use of deception:  subjects were led
        to believe that the experiment was about remembering the
        values of variables from one side of the paper to the other.
        "The answers" that "subjects [gave when] asked to ... list
        any strategies they used" "all related to remembering information
        about the assignment statements.  There was no mention of
        the parenthesis problem."  This suggests that the subjects
        may have regarded the actual experiment as an unimportant
        distractor and not TRIED to perform it accurately.

    3.  C's bitwise operations are unusually, not to say unwisely, placed.
        Page 8 of the PDF tells us that one subject commented on being
        unfamiliar with << .  We are given no reason to believe that that
        subject was alone.  At one time, 53% of developers were said to
        use Visual Basic; perhaps the VB operators would have been, or
        would be, a better should for such an experiment?  In particular,
        the anomalous results for the "%" operator are suspicious, and
        the anomalous results for the "^" operator tend to suggest a
        subject population more familiar with "^"-meaning-exponentiation
        than "^"-meaning-exclusive-or.

    4.  I have some fairly serious statistical doubts about the analysis.
        Most of them are technical, but one isn't:  the results are based
        on just 17 subjects.  The fact that one subject out of the original
        18 didn't understand the problem makes one wonder about the sample.

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PPIG Discuss List (discuss@ppig.org)
Discuss admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Announce admin: http://limitlessmail.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
PPIG Discuss archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40ppig.org/

Reply via email to