Friday, November 17, 2006, 7:38:29 AM, you wrote: LH> Hi Dave,
LH> [...] >>> However, I'm willing to consider renaming if we have name conflicts with >>> core JDK classes (ie. in packages java.*). Does it sounds fair enough? >> Yes, but I do understand the problem. >> Not nice, but a possibility might be to prefix? >> E.g. Container => RContainer (restlet container) instead of >> java.awt.Container. LH> Oh, no, please don't. We have namespaces in Java (the package names), that LH> should be enough. I agree, this is a non-issue. Let's not bastardize the good names we have. Especially the ones that directly map to Roy's dissertation. I think the direct mapping is very helpful. The restlet code is well packaged. -Chris -- Chris Grindstaff | http://gstaff.org
