Hi,
It used to be possible to do:
router.attach("/foo/[0-9]*", ...);
>From the examples, it seems that the new way is:
router.attach("/foo/{id}", ...);It makes for a cleaner and more self-documented code, but I wonder if we're not losing some flexibility. For instance I could need to bind a resource to /foo/[0-9]*, and a different one to /foo/[a-z]*. This is no longer possible. -Vincent.
