Jerome Louvel <contact <at> noelios.com> writes: > Concerning the suggested solution, I don't see how it requires you to > subclass Router? Sub classing just Finder should be enough in your case. > Also, in most situations, you shouldn't even need to subclass Finder.
My mistake; there's no need to subclass router. > I'm open to continue this discussion for post-1.0 evolution. For now, let's > gain more experience with the current API. I'm also interested in hearing > more opinions on this. That sounds good to me. Sean
