Hi John, Thanks for the cool suggestions, we will try to progressively address all of them :-) I've added a RFE for tracking purpose: http://restlet.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=263
Best regards, Jerome > -----Message d'origine----- > De : John D. Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 8 février 2007 20:42 > À : [email protected] > Objet : Re: RFC - Web redesign > > Well, there's always the usual: > * More examples > - More tests > * More diagrams > > In addition... > > * Compliance tests > - RFCs > - Interoperability > - Etc. > * Benchmarks and various performance/scaling/etc. tests. > > Particularly important in both of those areas, IMHO, for restlet is > how do the various HTTP connectors (AsyncWeb, Simple, Jetty, embedded > Servlet...) compare to each other *as used by a restlet solution*. > > > But wait! There's more... > > * More ammo (comparisons, testimonials, examples, etc.) of restlet > solutons compared to other Java "frameworks" and solutions built in > other languages+frameworks. Features, development time, better > compliance, less bugs, better performance, etc. > > * The site needs to be able to show pretty much all of the docs, > files, etc. for all of the released versions. I.e., People need to be > able to get and read the docs, examples, etc. for v1.0.x for the next > couple of years even after v1.1.x and 1.2.x and 2.0.x and... are > released and active and retired. > > > Hope this helps, > John
