Hi Sean,
FreeMarker and Velocity extension have their own package names, so the
TemplateRepresentation class name isn't ambiguous if your consider the
package name. However, the org.restlet.resource package contains many
types of representations (XmlRepresentation, DomRepresentation, etc.) so
it is important to ensure that the name themselves aren't ambiguous.
Beside that, there isn't any technical reason. I only suggest to keep
the TemplateRepresentation name to ensure consistency with Velocity and
FreeMarker extensions, but this isn't an obligation.
Best,
Jerome
Sean Landis wrote :
I noticed that both the FreeMarker and Velocity representations have the same
name, whereas other representations go like DomRepresentation,
StringRepresentation, etc.
I'm adding my own template representation and I'm wondering if, given the above
naming inconsistency, if there's a reason (say reflection) why the two different
template representations are the same.
Sean
