At Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:17:19 -0700, "John D. Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/17/07, Erik Hetzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > You make some really good points; thanks for doing that. I wouldn't > > put this in 'should never' land, however. It's certainly not something > > that is clearly stated in RFC 2616. > > Actually... Check out section 9.1, particularly 9.1.2 Idempotent Methods.
As I understand it, idempotence has to do with side effects, not HTTP responses or their status codes. best, Erik Hetzner ;; Erik Hetzner, California Digital Library ;; gnupg key id: 1024D/01DB07E3
pgp0YNtcC3soy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
