If you place the password inside the URL as a parameter, won't that be
"sniffable" because the URL contents are not encrypted via SSL, only the
payload of the request? I think that's why Basic Authentication sends
the data inside the body of the POST as opposed to parameters within a
URL.

Mitch

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Lacey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 2:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Restful Login/Identifier
> 
> I have only just started mussing over the very same idea.  In 
> my thinking the URLs would be much more readable.  The core 
> user resource would be something like  
> http://example.com/users/{uname}  To use this for 
> authentication purposes, an application would receive 
> credentials from the user, and GET a URL like the following 
> from the RESTful authentication service: 
> https://example.com/users/{uname},{passwd} (note the use of 
> SSL).  That could return the same resource as the previous 
> URL, but more usefully could return, say, a SAML token 
> appropriate for the asking application.
> 
> Of course, one should not just assume that the proposed URI 
> scheme will last forever, so a better solution is for a 
> client to first request a form (from a "cool" URL), e.g., 
> http://example.com/authentication_form.  
> That form will contain the necessary fields to populate and 
> (assuming it's an HTML form) will allow you to construct a 
> URL.  However, in this case the URL would end up looking 
> something like this: 
> https://example.com/users?uname=placey&passwd=sekrit.  Which 
> isn't as pretty as the other version, but serves the same 
> purpose and uses a standard recipe for link construction.
> 
> Pete
> 
> 
> JC wrote:
> > I am trying to develop a Restful login system. Using a web 
> service I 
> > want to identify a user based on their user name and 
> password, but I 
> > am not sure the best (Restful) approach.
> >
> > I would like to avoid the RPC approach of calling an authenticate 
> > method, passing in a user name and password.
> >
> > The best (Restful) solution I have come up w/ so far is to have the 
> > URL HTTPS://www.example.com/user/{user}. The {user} 
> placeholder would 
> > be the MD5 value of the concatenated string of user name + password.
> >
> > Ex.
> > User name: MyName
> > Password: MyPassword
> > {user} = MD5(MyName+MyPassword)
> >
> > If the user is found return a XML representation of the 
> user, if not 
> > return a
> > 404 error.
> >
> > Thoughts, comments, suggestions?
> >   
> 

Reply via email to