John D. Mitchell <jdmitchell <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On 10/3/07, Sean Landis <sean.landis <at> gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So is HEAD too obscure to garner any interest? > > I think it's probably a good default to have allowHead == true and > default to having handleHead() call handleGet() but head should be > fully supportable as you say. > > FWIW, > John
That would be a good solution. Backward compatible too. Sean
