Maybe I am -- but it would have been better if I had time to put together a concrete proposal. I don't. :-(
--tim On Nov 28, 2007 8:42 AM, Stephan Koops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, you are right. > > greetings > Stephan > > Tim Peierls schrieb: > > On Nov 28, 2007 5:38 AM, Stephan Koops <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > I agree fully with Paul. Exceptions are the modern way to handle > > things, > > that don't are the normal way. The same thing should be possible for > > doPut(..), doGet(..), getRepresentation(.) and so on on subclasses > of > > org.restlet.resource.Resource. > > > > > > I agree only partly. I do *not* think the lower-level Handler API > > should work in terms of exceptions, but I do think the higher-level > > Resource API should provide a standard way to map checked exceptions > > (perhaps only Restlet-specific) back to the lower-level handling. > > > > --tim >
