On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:00 PM, keke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Another workable solution I have found -- if you are using XML and will get > > criticized for making up MIME types -- is to expose the browser-friendly > > HTML variant by itself on a distinct URI (e.g. person.html). That's sloppy > > too, just in a different way. > > I think this might be a better and clear way than specifying content > type in the HTTP header. The book Restful web service also recommends > doing this. It is both friendly to browser client and programmatic > client.
It's easy enough to support both approaches in the Resources' code. I.e., it doesn't have to be an either/or dichotomy. Take care, John
